Been turned down by a bank and don’t know why? Don’t be afraid to ask for feedback.
When can you expect feedback?
Everyone will give feedback to candidates rejected after second interview/assessment centre, but most say it’s not policy to offer it to candidates rejected earlier in the process. The exception was JPMorgan which said it would offer feedback to anyone who had interviewed at the bank.
Some offer feedback unsolicited. Others expect candidates to ask for it. In all cases, feedback is given over the phone by the graduate recruiter for the relevant division – who may or may not have been one of the interviewers.
How can I find out why I was rejected early in the process?
Officially most employers say you can’t, but unofficially, you might get lucky.
One employer says it doesn’t offer feedback for people rejected after a first interview because it would be unfair (although it’s not entirely clear why). Others say variously: “It depends who’s asking” and “If someone gives us a call and really wants feedback, we wouldn’t say no,” and “We do have instances where people email us after first interviews and we would then try to give it to them.”
Very few students actually ask for feedback at this stage, so there’s no harm in trying. Rothschild estimates that only about 10-20% of first round rejects ask. More surprisingly still, BarCap says only half of its second round rejects take up the offer of feedback – a missed opportunity, if ever there was one.
What’s the most common reason why people are rejected after an interview?
Three of the four employers we asked gave the same answer: insufficient preparation.
“Not having a good enough understanding of what they are applying for, how they may be suited to it, and what they would be doing day to day in their first year,” explains Derek Walker, head of campus recruitment at Barclays Capital.
“Not doing their homework. Having no idea what differentiates us from other employers,” says Raphaelle Mathias, an assistant director in investment banking responsible for graduate and intern recruitment at Rothschild.
“Not being prepared. Not being able to demonstrate competencies or an awareness of the business,” says Nathalie McDermid, graduate recruitment manager at Ernst & Young.
And if you do elicit feedback?
You may hear some uncomfortable truths, but that’s no reason for glossing over them.
“Listen to what the recruiter is letting you know. Use that information to take you forward in any other interviews you have, because most employers have similar processes,” says McDermid.
“Interviewing is not a perfect science but in 95% of cases we will be saying something that has been said about that person before by a teacher, tutor, colleague or friend. Listen, take note and sleep on it. Then talk it over with someone you trust,” advises BarCap's Walker.
Can you reapply after being rejected?
Officially, the answer is yes.
“It’s not uncommon for people to come back the following year and sometimes they are successful. People can change quite a lot over that time,” says Walker.
"Anonymous, Tue 08 Apr 08 " your post smacks of sour grapes. Rather than hammering the HR people who refused to hire you perhaps a little bit of introspection is in order? Candidates tend to not to get rejected because the interviewer is a sociopath; judging by the amount of vitriol (not to mention brazen arrogance) in your post its hardly surprising you got the hoof!
Add your comment »I second Anonymous, Commodities, Wed 09 Apr 08 wrt Anonymous, Tue 08 Apr 08. The whole system is a joke. It is amazing that these HR people and others are given such a free reign with such power over the applications, who are made by the future leaders. Having applications screened by people who don't have a clue (ie. HR) may look cheap but it's actually a false economy. Unless it is considered that anyone could do the job and so ultimately it does't matter who is recruited?
Add your comment »After I graduated I know for a fact I was rejected by HR after a strong endorsement by the practitioner interviewing. There was a question topic on the application form that we had not discussed and so it was left blank. The HR person's phone feedback was solely that "I did not have enough material to make a decision on so I had to reject you". This is a Big4 company. I hold grudges.
Another interesting event was when another company who rejected me stated they could not offer feedback to first-rounds. A week after they sent a survey form asking for feedback on their recruiting process. I responded that due to the volume of interviews undertaken I was unable to offer feedback on individual recruiting processes. Now being solidly in a role I would never trust HR to hire a person for me.
I agree with Michael and Anonmyous Tue 08. I was not provided with feedback countless times and when pormpted with recruitment selection surveys I responded that due to the amount of interviews taken and applications made I was also unable to provide feedback.
Add your comment »I`ve got formally the same rejections from different companies.Because the high volume of "superb" applications bla, bla, (my mistake was actually that I have applied close to the deadlines also).
My question why do they leave open the application(s) until end of February or March, when the available positions has been fulfilled already in December or January?
Back to feedbacks there was a company, which was really written by the HR person in charge,this September this will be the first company to apply for undergraduate position.
Didn't you know HR ppl are just "stupid"? They have NO ideas about whats going on in front/middle/back office(other than HR). NO knowledge in practice. Only "feelings" - I like this guy becos he's cute. I hate that guy becos he looks like George Bush.
Add your comment »I agree with anonymous.....that's why there's a credit crunch now because they just employ blinkered clones....who all agreed that lending to high risk individuals at the cost of everyone else was a good idea....well done HR.....I also agree with those who gave them a taste of their own medicine by not answering their useless survey's
Add your comment »I was today rejected by Deloitte. It was final round of recruitment process and after 3 months of going to their offices they send me e-mail and told me that I am really good but they are unable to hire me now. And only one person from HR division made a decision. I get this knowledgde at reception desk when i tried to call this lady who was responsible for recrutment process. It's absurd that HR has such a big power in hiring new employees. Maybe some of you had similar experience ?? write about it !!!
Add your comment »I had similar experience with the useless HR ppl. Head of operations interviewed me and she was very impressed but then some bellend HR interviewed me and was talking about him all the time and rejected me.
I think IB's should cut-off al the HR positions and they will be out of the credit crunch and anyways these ppl are good for nothing.
Despite having a masters degree cum laude I've been rejected from more than 20 applications simply because of my skin colour/ethnicity. Despite a tremendous skills shortage and an unemployment rate in excess of 20%, our government introduced racist laws to restrict certain people from certain population groups [often high caliber individuals] from obtaining employment in the finance (and other) sectors. See www.fscharter.co.za
Often, people who are not sufficiently qualified get the job just because of discrimination.
Sure, I can really understand how HR may have some flaws in the recruitment process (I have at times experienced the same I think) and completely agree it should be done better, but may I say that to those of you who come from Europe, UK etc the HR issues discussed here are nothing in comparison with the difficulties we face in developing countries.